The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals connected Jan. 15, 2020. (Miguel Gutierrez Jr./The Texas Tribune, Miguel Gutierrez Jr./The Texas Tribune)

Sign up for The Brief, our regular newsletter that keeps readers up to velocity connected the astir indispensable Texas news.

Texas’ highest tribunal for transgression cases connected Wednesday struck down a instrumentality that allows the lawyer wide to unilaterally prosecute predetermination cases.

The state’s Court of Criminal Appeals issued an 8-1 opinion saying a proviso of the instrumentality violates the separation of powers clause successful the Texas Constitution, representing an intrusion by the enforcement subdivision into the judicial branch. The lawyer wide tin lone get progressive successful a lawsuit erstwhile asked to by a territory oregon region attorney, the tribunal said.

Ad

Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican who has been assertive successful trying to basal retired elector fraud, bashed the sentiment from the all-GOP court. He said successful a tweet that the ruling “could beryllium devastating for aboriginal elections successful Texas.”

At involvement was a portion of the predetermination codification that says the lawyer general, the state’s apical instrumentality enforcement officer, “may prosecute a transgression discourtesy prescribed by the predetermination laws of this state.”

The proviso was thrown into jeopardy by a long-winding lawsuit involving Jefferson County Sheriff Zena Stephens. After the region territory lawyer declined to prosecute Stephens implicit campaign-finance allegations stemming from the 2016 election, Paxton's bureau stepped successful and obtained an indictment from a expansive assemblage successful neighboring Chambers County.

Ad

In its opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals overturned a lower-court ruling that said the predetermination codification proviso “clearly and unambiguously gives the Attorney General powerfulness to prosecute transgression laws prescribed by predetermination laws mostly whether those laws are wrong oregon extracurricular the Code.”

Rather, the Court of Criminal Appeals said, “the Attorney General tin prosecute with the support of the section authoritative but cannot initiate prosecution unilaterally.”

In his tweet, Paxton said the ruling means “Soros-funded territory attorneys volition person sole powerfulness to determine whether predetermination fraud has occurred successful Texas.” That is simply a notation to George Soros, the Democratic megadonor who has go a unit successful section authoritative elections.

Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee cheered the ruling. Harris County, the largest successful Texas, was the epicenter of election-related litigation successful the lead-up to the 2020 predetermination successful Texas.

Ad

“This is simply a large triumph for section authorities and Texans who are bushed of authorities officials exaggerating elector fraud claims to undermine elections,” Menefee tweeted.

2021 Texas Tribune